Tarax Kor
01-01-2006 02:54:13
HAPPY NEW YEARS!
Best wishes to all, and their friends and families.
Dalthid
04-01-2006 16:13:35
if this calendar time started at "0"... at the end of the first year, we called it "1" and headed into the second year, so on and so forth - hence, we're always a year behind... it's actually the 2007th year
Salth Khan
04-01-2006 20:47:41
That's just ridiculous. It ranks right up there with the loons who thought that the year 2000 actually marked the start of the new Millennium, when it actually began in 2001. And FYI, the very first year under the current system was year "1", not year "0", so your conclusion is deeply flawed.
Aghasett
05-01-2006 17:35:14
You're both wrong
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dbac5/dbac55c7dfabb17533156a5b4eefeccb21d8289c" alt="Razz :P"
When you account for numerous calendar revisions and shifting "start points" for year 1 A.D., unincorporated leap years and leap seconds, adjustments in daylight savings time, rotational decay, lengthened months and omitted days (e.g. in 1582 A.D. Sept-3 through Sept-13 were omitted when the English speaking world switched from the Julian Calendar's 365.25 days to the Gregorian Reform Calendar's 365.2422 days), we're somewhere at around 2003 in "true time."
Tarax Kor
06-01-2006 01:27:40
I [Expletive Deleted F-word]ing hate the New Year. X-)
Revenant
07-01-2006 13:06:15
I love New Year. But at the end of the day, the calender system we use now says it's 2006, so that's what i go by, and don't really think too much more about it...
Salth Khan
10-01-2006 16:07:06
You're both wrong
When you account for numerous calendar revisions and shifting "start points" for year 1 A.D., unincorporated leap years and leap seconds, adjustments in daylight savings time, rotational decay, lengthened months and omitted days (e.g. in 1582 A.D. Sept-3 through Sept-13 were omitted when the English speaking world switched from the Julian Calendar's 365.25 days to the Gregorian Reform Calendar's 365.2422 days), we're somewhere at around 2003 in "true time."
While your theory sounds interesting, its just not true at all. Since 1972 the entire world has been on an accurate time scale. That's when the first atomic clock was created, and time has been measured by that ever since. I'm going to believe the guys that know how to monitor and adjust the time since they apparently know more about this.
Also incorrect is your posting this response to what Dalthid and I were talking about. It had nothing at all to do with whether the first year was "0" or "1". Which by the way the first official year in A.D.
IS "1". B)
Tarax Kor
10-01-2006 16:27:50
"Yay! New calender! Woot! New way to count how old we get and how time passes us by! Yes!"
"Ok this is the
FIRST year of the new calender, new decade, new century, new millenium, new era, new shish-kabob!"
It all started at 1. Punks.
Jezzie
14-01-2006 09:52:31
Happy new year. Yep, I am a little late, aren't I?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dbac5/dbac55c7dfabb17533156a5b4eefeccb21d8289c" alt="Razz :P"
Regardless of what you think the date is, I hope yours is happy and Blessed.
Vladeck
21-01-2006 17:58:29
Im really late to say this but HAPPY NEW YEAR may the dark be with us all this year
Shadow
09-02-2006 06:02:10
ok who cares about the calenda, a happy new year to ya all, sory about being a we bit late
Ceric Crimson
10-02-2006 18:11:49
hay! Happy New Year to all of you just waking up from hybernation!